|
(United States Related) |
Created Date: 11-Mar-2019 |
| Elected Control
by Political Party in the United States since the 1960s through 2019 |
Last updated: 26-Sep-2025 |
| at the State Legislation, Governorship
and Federal Elected Area |
|
| A
A
A
help
|
|
 
Sections
 
Most likely all Governments in the world have recognized war, or the
threat of war, as a formidable political tool:
- A distraction against the citizens of the country to hide theft
and treason by their leaders that include captains of industry.
- A method for profiteering wealth for manufacturing of any area
of required weapons, transportation, and food provisions that can
involve money to the leadership with legal consulting compensation
and stocks in the companies.
What is not always recognized as an equivalent method of
a Political Party in power
creating false Social Issues to hide theft and mismanagement by their
leaders:
- The deliberate fabrication of social injustice can be used to
manipulate media information news stories to distract from
Government problems and incompetence.
- The exploitation of unemployment in an area to set up government
funded programs that spin-off money back to some Political Party's
member in private ownership of a company for the government
supported programs.
In 1939, Adolf Hitler used "Operation
Himmler" in a propaganda use of a false Social Issue, was expertly
used to accomplish the goals of conquering Poland by:
- Gorilla civilian warfare by destroying and sabotaging government
and private building and services that were also part of Poland's
eastern border defenses.
- Influenced the opinions of Germans and other countries to hate
the Polish.
- Creating a means for the next phase of a military invasion that
the other countries in Europe deemed justified before WWII started.
The Roman Historian
Publius
Cornelius Tacitus who had many insightful quotes, wrote: "It is human nature to hate those whom we have injured."
In modern-times, there are Political Theorist that are often exposing
the use of creating social issues when a political party is facing
negative scrutiny in the media to take attention away from the real
problems facing political-party leadership of government. |
The Paramount Problem
The paramount problem with any democratic type-of society is the people who
are not the Politicians. The Politicians reflect the ability to act in
ways that are not in the best for society by the amount of tolerance, apathy,
ignorance, and lack of integrity in the personal lives of the voters.
Many people do not realize that the oxymoron statement is true which states
that a liberal person is more conservative than the liberal's counterpart.
The staunch liberal voter, through agreement or alignment of voters in their
political party on any topic that they can even disagree, will oppose a
conservative voter and conservative politicians demanding that their liberal
viewpoints be allowed even at the expense of the taxpayer, government, and civil
liberties of others where violence is always considered as part of the tools to
get a liberals desires accomplished.
For the life-time of this author dating back to the 1960s, liberals have
conducted events that involve destruction of private property, public property,
violence, and murder with very little negative media coverage and prosecutions.
The media should reflect information without personal bias, innuendos,
favoritism, and opinion segments that do not have counterpoint segments.
- The
Washington DC Capital Building Attack of 2021 (notice media called it an
attack and also a riot) stayed on media outlets for over a year with
extremely punitive prosecution for everyone arrested, and very defamatory
media coverage that went beyond standards of reporting of news.
- Before the Washington DC event, there was hundreds of BLM Protests (not
called riots or attacks) in dozens of cities, which resulted in many
murders, very violent altercations between the BLM members that sent
hundreds of people to hospitals, nearly a billion dollars in private and
public property damage all of which resulted in very little negative media
coverage and very little arrests except for people protecting personal
property.
The Media has been argued to be a paid ally of the liberal political party
through overwhelming organized ownership of media outlets that political parties
know can shape people's viewpoints. The sad old clich is unfortunately
appears to be an axiom for news outlets, which states "if
it bleeds then it leads in the news story."
Liberalism Will Ultimately Always Win in Politics
In all of the Democratic style governmental countries, as of the year 2023
there are 74 democracies, the
Political Party which allies itself with liberal philosophies will always be the
controlling and winning elected Political Party over a period of time. As
the scriptures and so many commonly known expressions such as "power
corrupts absolutely" inform us, the problem with anyone of us taking
a liberal standpoint allows us to be open to eventually having sinful lifestyles
and viewpoints when allowing and believing there is:
- No absolute truth, and
- No accountability required in some circumstances.
From the Roman Historian
Publius
Cornelius Tacitus who had many insightful quotes:
- They have plundered the world, stripping naked the land in their
hunger... they driven by greed, if their enemy be rich; by ambition,
if poor... They ravage, they slaughter, they seize by false
pretenses, and all of this they hail as the construction of empire.
And when in their wake nothing remains but a desert, they call that
peace.
- The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government.
- If you would know who controls, you then would see who you
cannot criticize.
- Formerly we suffered from crimes; now we suffer from laws.
- When the State is corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied.
|
The United States is an example of this observed Political Party problem,
with the imbalance of power, because of Liberalism.
Liberalism is
defined by WIKI and other encyclopedia types of definitions as having many
positive attributes, where
Conservatism also has many positive attributes. The wrongful side of
liberalism is:
- Not having any standards for people and companies to aspire where
governmental money and resources are used to gain votes when there was
absolutely no requirement for expenditure of money and resources.
- Ignoring and not enforcing already establish laws because it will offend
voting groups.
Power and winning elections are being obtained through
deception in both United States Political Parties, but the Political Party that
allied itself with Liberalism have the easiest deception tools, methods and
emissaries to be utilized.
- Liberal financial spending will gain favorable public approval.
- Allying perceived (and event fraudulent) victims will have people believing
a Political Party cares for people and the other Political Parties does
not.
- Controlling the content most of the publicized news, by all the possible methods for disseminate information,
benefits only Political Party. It doesn't matter if the content is
incorrect. Nazis propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels said "if
you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth."
Everyone of us will be gravitated to listen to an informational news story
that shows a victim. We all want justice (sometimes revenge) for victims
we hear about in the news. This fundamental aspect of human-nature is
additionally relied upon by the entertainment industry of movies, television
shows, literature and magazines as no one wants to watch a movie where the bad
people win.
While wonderful stories, that have no victims or injustice, can gain people's
attention, the primary reason people spend time to listen and watch any media
presentation regarding news is an interest in what happened and was there justice. Injustice and problems can also be invented as a means
of distraction for the public to not observe real problems and injustice.
In the United States, which primarily has a two party political party
structure consisting of Democrats and Republicans, it does not matter what the
Republican Party pledges and tries to accomplish because
the Democrat Party,
since at least the 1960s, have dominated control and influence in the news media
and entertainment media. By controlling directly and indirectly
will have the
greatest ability to influence voters. Some
well-known and easily observed deception and omission points:
- Control and Own the News Informational Sources: (Most
people have the abilities to recognize bias news reporting.)
(a) Local television news, where the broadcast is often reading from a
teleprompter, have
exactly the same information that other television news media
broadcasting outlets are reading. The teleprompter information is
provided by companies that sell their informational and broadcast-ready news
information. Local television news media outlets do not have the
financial ability to have paid staff working to research, write and organize
all of the national and local news informational stories. Print media
outlets such as magazine, newspapers and internet websites utilize the same
information news companies.
(b) National television news media outlets, that do have financial
resources, often utilize the same news information with a type-of
repackaging. A simple and minor proof example is a national media
outlet will reprint, redisplay and rebroadcast information about an event
happening somewhere that was originally investigated somewhere else.
(While this topic is not listing the ownership and sources of news
information being disseminated, bias information is easily discerned when
only one side of a topic is presented. This has been seen for
decades.)
- Allies in the Entertainment Industry: The entertainment industry,
knowing how to gain people for viewing, when dealing with human
personalities of primary characters, will almost involve characters with
complex moral problems to get viewers interest. Additionally,
conservative viewpoints are routinely made to be target of jokes or to be
ridiculed in a very disproportionately scale compared to liberal viewpoints.
(a) The financial gains, in the entertainment industry, has afforded many
participants
the ability to literally enjoy a lifestyle of abundance which often tempts
these people into excess sinful pleasures addictions with extreme arrogance
of self-righteousness that will openly speak in public about conservative
ideas of accountability and acting righteously.
(b) The entertainment movies and television industry often use their shows
as a podium to popularize their opinions that too often are trying exonerate
themselves from lifestyles that are openly against the scriptures along with
the attempts to humilate conservative ideas of accountability and acting
righteously.
Corruption is Impossible to be Eliminated in Democratic
Governments
Note: It is this author's opinion and a partial reworded excerpt
from the Political Party
Allegiance Topic:
- That no matter what is said publicly by a Politician in speeches
or seen in the Media concerning any person from any Political Party,
it is impossible for
Politicians to not eventually become corrupted, willingly or
unwillingly. Choosing otherwise means the
Politician will be stopped during the election or re-election
process, by different Entities In Power (EIP). These EIP
collectively, while different from one-another and compete with one
another, are control everything, so that a Politician has to ally
themselves with one or more of them.
(a) A Politician has a choice to accept financial
compensation, outside of their salary, for doing actions for
specific power groups that are behind the scenes, or by not
accepting, the Politician becomes a target to be replaced.
(b) The higher the public office for the Politician, there are
vulnerabilities that will be exploited concerning any type of
unethical and immoral proclivity that can be used as part of a type
of political blackmail that is done in what is called a dossier.
J Edgar Hoover is best known in history for creating dossiers on
political enemies.
(c) At the worst level, there has been sporadic cases of Politicians
and assistants to Politicians, having their lives ended by
mysterious and sudden medical conditions that appear ordinary on the
surface, when previous medical checkups showed no signs.
- It has
become impossible for anyone of any Political Party to do anything
to stop the corruption that has taken over the positions of office
from the local to the federal level. One Political
Party, may appear to be more corrupt, from what is partially seen
and heard from the Media, but all Politicians serve different power
groups, where the power groups hold no political party allegiance,
as their goals are financial and power gains.
- Unfortunately, most of
the Media is also completely corrupted, with exception of
small independent sources, because the people in power behind the
scenes, learned multiple decades ago that by purchasing and
controlling the Media, then this allowed the process of
misinformation to shape people's opinions. The tools are using
half-truths, omissions, false wording, and out right deception.
(a) Do a search on
YouTube and there are numerous examples of TV Stations all repeating
the same scripted dialogues.
|
Democrats Are Primarily in Power
This information was summarized from the following links based on 2018 data
which was primarily taken from these links:
What the data shows is the Democrat
Party has always been in control since 1961 for the majority of the time at the
Federal and State Levels. In the overwhelming majority of the
biggest and influential cities in the USA, at the city levels in positions of
mayor and council persons, there are cities that Democrats have been 100% in
control since the 1960s.
With this power, the Democrat Party should have already accomplished great
things, but they have:
- Not brought back American manufacturing companies from foreign countries
like China and southeast Asia.
- Not stopped foreign workers in Engineering and Computer Sciences to come
into the USA to be employed at very low wages to supplant American citizens
along with the theft intellectual property.
- Not stopped the move of Pharmaceutical
Development to other countries.
- Not stopped the ever-increasing numbers of peoples from many countries
coming into the USA illegally and then given living expenses, free education
and so much more.
| From a purely statistical standpoint, and not taking into account
philosophies of the Democrat Party, the Democrat Party can be blamed for
as much as 60% to 100% of the problems not fixed in the United States
based on their periods of time while being in office. |
What People of Each Political Party Believe
There has come a belief, in recent times, that the following two statements are true.
They are
regarding the core mentality of a Democrat and Republican citizen:
- Democrat People will always believe, want and demand that other people
should take care of them based on the emotional based reasoning that there
are people with more financial resources, better physical abilities,
ethnicity and good
luck. Therefore, the Democrat person feels it is only fair to be given
financial benefits at the expense and taxation of others through the
government so that everyone can have the same benefits and even luxuries in
life. The Democrat Politician knows this and therefore promises to
deliver these ideals that requires higher taxation and restricting
legislation.
- Republican People will always believe, want and desire that everyone
participates in the process of improving their own lives by working for
themselves and also to never rely upon and receive anything that was not
earned. Therefore, the Republican person finds it very objectionable
to see anyone getting any benefits that was not earned. The Republican
Politician knows this and therefore promises to relieve tax burdens and
guarantee accountability. When Republican Politicians introduce
legislation to cut taxes and free up business to operate, then Democrats
come out in force in the Media to state everything is to benefit the rich.
The Pareto principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, has many facets. In
business journals there has been the reciprocal additional definition given when
dealing with a company team of workers that can also apply to sports teams:
- 20% of the people do 80% of the work,
- 80% of the people only do 20% of the work.
This 80/20 rule can be applied to people in view of their preferred political
party. It implies that the
majority of people will gravitate and fall into the category of the Democrat
philosophies because of the belief that they will be taken care of by the
government. This is why the
Democrat Party will always be the winning political party.
Democrat's Biggest Problem
Read the topic on Conundrum of
Socialism in the United States before continuing.
There are no rural, inner-city or sparsely populated areas of the United
States where poverty, crime and moral-decay is rampant that are Republican
controlled and have a majority of Republican identifying citizens.
All the areas that have rampant poverty, crime and moral-decay are 100% Democrat controlled areas that have been that way for
decades since the 1960s, where after 60 years there should have been an
improvement that cannot be blamed on Republicans.
At A High Level
As just noted above, the Democrat Party has predominately contained an edge
by having the most voters. With this power, they have accomplished some
good things at the Federal Level along with a few areas at the State Level.
- In 1930s, created the New Deal to create jobs by Governmental Works
programs, stabilizing of farm prices, electricity to rural communities.
- In 1935 crated the Social Security Act to provide assistance to
retirees, unemployed people, widows and orphans.
- In 1944, signed the GI Bill to help veterans returning from WWII to get
a jump start on mortgages, business, tuition and more
- In 1964, signed the Civil Rights Act?
- Since the 1960s, to name a few areas: there has been a great deal of
legislation to protect the environment, equal access for the handicapped to
all buildings and parking, promote equality for people with alternate
lifestyles, protection for animals and minimal wage guarantees.
At a very high level, the Republican Party has accomplished some great things
at the Federal, State, City and County areas. Many people, when being
honest, would point out that the Republican Party has done far more
than the Democrats despite the lack of times in power.
- The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 under President Abraham Lincoln.
- Gave the right to vote to women in 1872.
- Construction of the Panama Canal in 1904
- Elected the first woman to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1916.
- Construction of the Hover Dam in 1928
- Construction of the Interstate Highway System in 1956
- Desegregating Public Schools in 1957 with protection issued by Dwight
Eisenhower.
- The Civil Rights Act of 1960 under Dwight Eisenhower.
- President Regan Tax Cuts of 1981.
- President Regan works and succeeds in the collapse of the Soviet Union.
- Republican Congress balances the budget in 1998-2001.
Summary Data Showing Democrat Control through 2019
| |
Control Percentage by Political Party |
|
| |
Years 1960 through Year 2019 |
|
| |
State Legislation |
Governorships |
Federal Total Control |
Federal Majority Control |
|
|
Democrat |
60.53% |
53.19% |
26.67% |
60.00% |
<-Winner |
|
Republican |
34.21% |
44.68% |
10.00% |
40.00% |
|
|
Split/Tie |
5.26% |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Control in the United States |
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
57.91% |
<-Winner |
|
|
|
|
Republican |
39.63% |
|
|
|
|
Detailed Data Showing Democrat Control
Split means inconclusive control of one party.
| |
State Legislations controlled |
|
|
|
|
# |
Year |
Democrat |
Republican |
Split |
|
Democrat |
Republican |
|
1 |
1960 |
27 |
15 |
6 |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
1962 |
25 |
17 |
6 |
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
1964 |
32 |
6 |
10 |
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
1966 |
23 |
16 |
9 |
|
1 |
|
|
5 |
1968 |
20 |
20 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
1970 |
23 |
16 |
9 |
|
1 |
|
|
7 |
1972 |
26 |
16 |
7 |
|
1 |
|
|
8 |
1974 |
37 |
4 |
8 |
|
1 |
|
|
9 |
1976 |
35 |
4 |
10 |
|
1 |
|
|
10 |
1978 |
31 |
11 |
7 |
|
1 |
|
|
11 |
1980 |
29 |
15 |
5 |
|
1 |
|
|
12 |
1982 |
34 |
11 |
4 |
|
1 |
|
|
13 |
1984 |
26 |
11 |
12 |
|
1 |
|
|
14 |
1986 |
28 |
9 |
12 |
|
1 |
|
|
15 |
1988 |
29 |
8 |
12 |
|
1 |
|
|
16 |
1990 |
30 |
6 |
13 |
|
1 |
|
|
17 |
1992 |
25 |
8 |
16 |
|
1 |
|
|
18 |
1994 |
18 |
19 |
12 |
|
|
1 |
|
19 |
1996 |
20 |
18 |
11 |
|
1 |
|
|
20 |
1998 |
20 |
17 |
12 |
|
1 |
|
|
21 |
2000 |
16 |
18 |
15 |
|
|
1 |
|
22 |
2002 |
18 |
17 |
14 |
|
1 |
|
|
23 |
2003 |
16 |
21 |
12 |
|
|
1 |
|
24 |
2004 |
17 |
21 |
11 |
|
|
1 |
|
25 |
2005 |
20 |
20 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
2007 |
24 |
16 |
9 |
|
1 |
|
|
27 |
2008 |
23 |
15 |
12 |
|
1 |
|
|
28 |
2009 |
27 |
15 |
8 |
|
1 |
|
|
29 |
2010 |
27 |
15 |
8 |
|
1 |
|
|
30 |
2011 |
15 |
27 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
|
31 |
2012 |
15 |
29 |
6 |
|
|
1 |
|
32 |
2013 |
17 |
28 |
5 |
|
|
1 |
|
33 |
2014 |
17 |
28 |
5 |
|
|
1 |
|
34 |
2015 |
11 |
31 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
|
35 |
2016 |
11 |
31 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
|
36 |
2017 |
12 |
32 |
6 |
|
|
1 |
|
37 |
2018 |
13 |
32 |
5 |
|
|
1 |
|
38 |
2019 |
19 |
29 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
Republican |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
13 |
| |
State Legislation Control |
Democrat |
60.53% |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Republican |
34.21% |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Even/Tie |
5.26% |
|
|
|
| |
Governorships controlled |
|
|
|
|
# |
Year |
Democrat |
Republican |
Independent |
|
Democrat |
Republican |
|
1 |
1960 |
34 |
16 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
1962 |
34 |
16 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
1964 |
33 |
17 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
1966 |
25 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1967 |
24 |
26 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
6 |
1968 |
19 |
31 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
7 |
1969 |
18 |
32 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
8 |
1970 |
29 |
21 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
9 |
1971 |
30 |
20 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
10 |
1972 |
31 |
19 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
11 |
1973 |
32 |
18 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
12 |
1974 |
36 |
13 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
13 |
1976 |
37 |
12 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
14 |
1978 |
32 |
18 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
15 |
1979 |
31 |
19 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
16 |
1980 |
27 |
23 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
17 |
1982 |
34 |
16 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
18 |
1983 |
35 |
15 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
19 |
1984 |
34 |
16 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
20 |
1986 |
26 |
24 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
21 |
1988 |
28 |
22 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
22 |
1989 |
29 |
21 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
23 |
1990 |
28 |
20 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
24 |
1992 |
30 |
18 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
25 |
1993 |
29 |
19 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
26 |
1994 |
19 |
30 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
27 |
1995 |
18 |
31 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
28 |
1996 |
17 |
32 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
29 |
1998 |
17 |
31 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
30 |
1999 |
18 |
30 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
31 |
2000 |
19 |
29 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
32 |
2001 |
21 |
27 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
33 |
2002 |
24 |
26 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
34 |
2004 |
22 |
28 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
35 |
2006 |
28 |
22 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
36 |
2008 |
29 |
21 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
37 |
2009 |
26 |
24 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
38 |
2010 |
26 |
23 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
39 |
2011 |
20 |
29 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
40 |
2012 |
20 |
29 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
41 |
2013 |
20 |
30 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
42 |
2014 |
21 |
29 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
43 |
2015 |
18 |
31 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
44 |
2016 |
18 |
31 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
45 |
2017 |
15 |
34 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
46 |
2018 |
16 |
33 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
47 |
2019 |
23 |
27 |
|
|
|
1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
Republican |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
21 |
| |
Governorship Control |
Democrat |
53.19% |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Republican |
44.68% |
|
|
|
| |
USA Presidency, Senate and Congress Control |
|
Total Control |
|
|
Majority Control |
|
# |
Year |
President |
Senate |
House |
|
Democrat |
Republican |
|
|
Democrat |
Republican |
|
1 |
1961 1963 |
D |
D |
D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
1963 1965 |
D |
D |
D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
1965 1967 |
D |
D |
D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
1967 1969 |
D |
D |
D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
5 |
1969-1971 |
R |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
6 |
1971-1973 |
R |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
7 |
1973-1975 |
R |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
8 |
1975-1977 |
R |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
9 |
1977 1979 |
D |
D |
D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
10 |
1979 1981 |
D |
D |
D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
11 |
1981-1983 |
R |
R |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
12 |
1983-1985 |
R |
R |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
13 |
1985-1987 |
R |
R |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
14 |
1987-1989 |
R |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
15 |
1989-1991 |
R |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
16 |
1991-1993 |
R |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
17 |
1993 1995 |
D |
D |
D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
18 |
1995-1997 |
D |
R |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
19 |
1997-1999 |
D |
R |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
20 |
1999-2001 |
D |
R |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
21 |
2001-2003 |
R |
D |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
22 |
2003 2005 |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
23 |
2005 2007 |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
24 |
2007-2009 |
R |
D |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
25 |
2009 2011 |
D |
D |
D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
26 |
2011-2013 |
D |
D |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
27 |
2013-2015 |
D |
D |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
28 |
2015-2017 |
D |
R |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
29 |
2017-2019 |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
30 |
2019-2021 |
R |
R |
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Democrat |
Republican |
|
|
Democrat |
Republican |
| |
Total Control at Federal Level |
|
8 |
3 |
|
|
18 |
12 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total Federal Control |
Democrat |
26.67% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Republican |
10.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Majority Federal Control |
Democrat |
60.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Republican |
40.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Hate Speech against Conservatives
Political hate speech is using words that insult undeserving individuals or
groups of people based on attributers of ethnicity, religious beliefs, sexual
orientations, physical disability, and mental disabilities. Hate speech is
in either verbal or written form, and in Politics is predominately used as a weapon
against someone that does not necessarily agree with the antagonists' ideology
politically.
Since the 1990s, in the United States, there are overwhelming numbers in the
multiple of thousands of
people, all identifying as Democrats (NOT ALL DEMOCRATS), that react to anything they do not like or
agree with by:
- Burning down portion of cities with most notable and not limited to places
like Los Angeles, California.
- In large groups of people are looting stores.
- In large groups of people are severely hurting others along with
murdering others.
- Attacking the Police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agents.
- Destroying or vandalizing privately owned Tesla vehicles and severely
vandalize Tesla Dealerships
- In multiple occasions, conducting long range assignation attempts from
the roof top of building with rifles against political adversaries including
President to be Donald Trump, Christians, Police Officers, Immigration and
Customs Enforcement Agents and Immigration and Customs Enforcement vehicles.
- Insisting that free speech is not allowed when it goes against their
beliefs.
- Getting on Social Platforms and
having Media News Outlet making statements that their evil actions of
looting, murdering, and destroying are justified because they don't agree
with opinions and political beliefs of conservatives.
These same Democrats then call everyone that is conservative: Fascists,
Racists and Nazis which is unbelievable ignorant, extremely defamatory, insulting, and a complete contradiction as these
people conducting the listed eight stated actions above are:
- Doing the same
actions of
Hitler's
Brown Shirts that paved the way for Nazis Germany.
(a) Note the Sturmabtelun, Storm Troopers of the 1920 through 1930s, was the starting
paramilitary organization under Hitler that were also called Brown Shirts
because of their uniforms.
(b) This author is waiting for Democrats to start
wearing some sort of uniform to unify all of their efforts of stealing,
vandalism, physically hurting people, and murdering people.
- Protesting against Israel with extreme vial hatred. That is
exactly what the Nazis started in the beginnings of their terror reign that
lead to their goal of murdering all the Jewish People they could find.
See the topic on why is
Lucifer still actively trying to eliminate all Jewish people.
| The following is an excerpt from the topic on
Communism and Fascism: The term Fascist is often used as an insult towards people who are conservative.
Conservative People are those who believe
in self-reliance and everyone earning their own way with help to only the truly
needy and are often regarded as Capitalists. The best definition for
Fascism comes from "The
Concise Encyclopedia of Economics":
"As an economic system,
fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer.
The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied
bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism
was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism,
with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented
egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive
persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of
nationalism and racialism blood and soil for the internationalism of both
classical liberalism and Marxism.
Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society s economic processes through direct state
operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of
nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly,
by requiring owners to use their property in the national interest that is, as the autocratic authority
conceived it. ... " by Sheldon Richman
|
What to read next?
(1)
Communism and Socialism
vs. Democracy with Additional Thoughts and Clarity on Fascism, (2)
Historical Racism
in the United States and its use in Politics, (3)
Liberalism and the
arguments used, (4)
Racism Test, (5)
Cops Kill by Race? (6)
Illegal Immigration - USA and Mexico with those who cross into the USA illegally
(7) USA in the Bible (9)
Political Party Blind Allegiance
(10) A
Democrat Conundrum (11)
Peaceful People are Irrelevant Point